Smarick Says It Simply; Chartering Can Replace The District. But Can It?

My blogging buddy Jersey Jazzman has already done a fantastic job skewering Andy Smarick's Ouija Board fantasy of a chartery future for Newark.

Said simply, chartering can replace the district. And it can happen in Newark.

Well, can't get much more blunt than that.  Kudos to Smarick for just coming right on out and saying what it seems like the NJDOE really wants.  Urban districts overrun with charters, with districts obsolete.  

Game plan duly noted. 

But before we hand the keys to the Newark Public Schools to charter operators, let's take a look at the picture that accompanied Smarick's piece.

Now where have I seen this picture before?? 

OH RIGHT!  In this article about Christie visiting Newark's Robert Treat Academy just one day after being elected Governor.

"As I traveled all around the state, campaigning for governor there was only one school I talked about more than any other school in New Jersey," Christie told the students. "I wanted for every child in the state, to get an education like all of you are getting."

But Christie has been silent about the Robert Treat Academy cheating scandal that broke earlier this month.  Even the typically understated John Mooney called it a "black eye" for the often touted charter.  

The report is a humdinger.  Peruse it if you have the time.  It's chock full of goodies like the School Test Coordinator not having a key to the conference room where test booklets were kept, VP Theresa Abudato (who had a key) signing the name of Principal Michael Pallante (who had a key) on Security Checklists, and staff joking that Pallante, Abudato and others were in the conference room for hours "going over the test booklets to make sure the students did well."

The Robert Treat statement claims that a test strategy was employed where students were encouraged to fill in the two best answers and then erase one, which lead to the high erasure rate.  Except there were discrepancies amongst teachers interviewed as to whether kids were encouraged to do this in their test booklets or on their answer sheets, and the two students interviewed by investigators BOTH stated they were not taught this strategy.

So as Christie "travels around the state campaigning for Governor" between now and 2013, (as of today, he is officially running for reelection) it's doubtful he will continue to sing the praises of Robert Treat.

It also seems doubtful that even Christie is brazen enough to campaign on Smarick's vision of a ticking clock counting down to the end of traditional public schools in Newark.  

Today, this district has everything it could ask for: a reform-oriented teachers contract, a new state law on tenure and evaluation, funding twice the national average, the $100 million Mark Zuckerberg donation, partnerships with leading nonprofit organizations, freedom from a politically motivated school board, a tough local superintendent, a reform-friendly mayor, the nation’s best state superintendent and an incomparably bold governor. 

So we should happily call this the beginning of a new era. But we must also declare an end to the excuses. If the district can’t generate better results here and now, it never will. The governor should say so — and then put the district on the clock. (emphasis mine)

Smarick should consult his Oujia Board about the 2013 gubernatorial race before he starts that clock.  'Reform friendly' Newark Mayor Cory Booker seems to be the candidate everyone hopes to see challenge 'incomparably bold governor' Christie.  

If Christie and Booker end up head to head in 2013, Smarick's reformy vision for Newark, far fetched to begin with, would seem to be DOA.  

ADDING:
I was looking at Christie's poll numbers this morning (after a friend on Facebook noted his high approval rating as he announced his re-election bid).  Just two years into his first term Christie's popularity tumbled, with 47% disapproving of the job he was doing and only 44% approving.

"Gov. Christie is having a big problem with women, perhaps because they care more about schools and disapprove, 60 to 34 percent, of the way he's handling education," Maurice Carroll, director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute, said in a statement released with the survey results. "But voters like their 'Jersey guy' governor better as a person than they like his policies. Men like him a lot; women, not so much." (emphasis mine)

Christie needs to ratchet down his aggressive education agenda if he wants to stay in the good graces of the women in this state and maintain his office. Heeding Smarick's advice and eradicating public education as we know it could spell disaster for Christie in 2013.

Have You Heard The One About The Kid From Camden, The Tea Partier And The Rabbi?

A Trenton Times guest opinion column was brought to my attention this morning by a sister Save Our Schools NJ Organizer, and from all of my research on issues related to Tikun Olam and Hatikvah I had some knowledge of the author of the piece.

His byline says "Israel Teitelbaum serves as secretary of Alliance for Free Choice in Education"  Check out the link.  Thin on content, heavy on rhetoric.  

So is his column.  

Seems it was inspired by the E3 sponsored Camden parents class action complaint seeking the immediate transfer of their kids out of the Camden public schools.  

E3 threw up a heavy handed press release after the parents were denied.  Oh look!  The only comment is from Mr. Teitelbaum himself!  Just a snippet from his comment:

Those who control education also control our nation’s culture and all that evolves there from, including the role of government in directing our lives. The greatest government-sanctioned violation of our civil rights, and denial of our liberty, occurs every day when government financially coerces parents to send their children to government schools. This has no place in a free society, and parental choice in education needs to be fully implemented NOW!

Huh, that doesn't really make it sound like this is about kids in Camden for Mr. Teitelbaum, does it?  

His column is chuck full of union bashing, Tea Party inspired liberty and limited government gobbledygook, and even a pitch for the "recent" films "The Cartel" and "Waiting for Superman"!  Man, Mr. Teitelbaum is sure casting a wide net there!

If you can stomach it, watch this YouTube video of Mr. Teitelbaum at a Tea Party School Choice meeting.  Don't say I didn't warn you.

I'm still not entirely buying that this is about kids in Camden or Tea Party politics for Mr. Teitelbaum though, are you?     

Feels like there must be something else in this for him....:

It’s a fair bet that when area Orthodox rabbis meet on Monday, August 3, with Republican gubernatorial candidate Christopher J. Christie, they are going to receive information that will please them—and, more importantly, their day school-tuition-beleaguered congregants—on the issue of school vouchers. 

Mr. Christie supports school-choice, and a pilot program currently simmering in the state legislature could help Jewish families in at least two communities receive vouchers or tuition tax benefits. 

The meeting is being organized by Howie Beigelman, the Orthodox Union’s professional who is responsible for state government relations.

Among those who will be attending the meeting with Mr. Christie is Rabbi Israel Teitelbaum, a spiritual leader of Cong Ahavath Yisrael in Morristown and the director of Parents for a Free Choice in Education. He said he and a colleague from the shul, Michoel Kotler, hoped to bring to the table their experience gained over many years of participation in the struggle for school-choice. 

Rabbi Teitelbaum said that even though most Orthodox rabbis recognize the importance of vouchers or tax relief for parents sending children to day schools, many are afraid to get involved in the struggle. 

“Too many of them believe that politics and synagogues don’t mix. They are afraid that taking an activist role, or even talking about the issue, could be a violation of IRS regulations,” he said. 

He is hoping the OU-sponsored meeting with Mr. Christie will help abate those fears." (emphasis mine)

Ah, now that makes more sense.  

And much easier to avoid any trouble with the IRS for using your tax exempt religious institution for political activities if you just mask what you're really advocating for.  

We're to believe that Rabbi Teitelbaum is fighting for the needs of kids in Camden?  I'm not buying it, any more than I bought that the founders of Tikun Olam wanted to serve kids in New Brunswick.  

School Choice sure does make strange bedfellows, doesn't it?  

The New, Stark Reality Of School Board Elections In New Jersey

From former Highland Park School Board President Sharon Krengel  

Dear Darcie,

You didn’t lose the school board election yesterday. Turns out you never had a prayer – but that was through no fault of your own! It was because your name came out of a hat fourth out of four candidates for three seats on our local board. The numbers clearly show that many people chose to vote 1, 2, 3 on the tiny section of the ballot devoted to the school board election, right over the red button everyone had to push to cast their votes.

Our town, like many others, agreed to the Faustian bargain proposed by the governor last year. We moved our school board vote to Election Day so that we would no longer have to submit our school budget to voters. There are sound arguments in favor of this – why do voters have a say in school budgets, when they don’t vote on municipal, county or state budgets? Why should the school district pay for  a separate, costly election with low turnout?

But there are arguments against this change, too. We saw the most distressing one play out yesterday. Voters did not take the time to learn about the four candidates, the issues plaguing our schools, the state of public education in NJ. They walked into the voting booth and selected 1, 2, 3, down the line, without a thought.

Why would that happen? Is it because there is too much noise during a regular election season, and no space for non-partisan school board candidates to be heard? Is it because there are many people in every town who are too busy or too disconnected from the public schools to become educated about a school board race before casting their votes? Is it because some people don’t grasp how important local governance of our schools is – to our entire community as well as to our young people?

We don’t know the answers yet, but we’d better figure them out if we care about our schools and our town.

Which brings me back to you. You have a deep understanding of what our public schools are facing – in fact, you’ve been nationally recognized for it. You understand the peril – yes, peril – of the corporate “reform” agenda espoused by the current governor and Department of Education.

You know how incredibly important resources are, especially for schools serving students who are hungry, who don’t have an adult advocate, whose families are experiencing very hard times – the list of challenges goes on and on, unfortunately.

You know what many more standardized tests, connected with the “national curriculum” NJ has adopted and is beginning to impose on local districts, will mean for our students and our teachers and how it will narrow our curriculum, especially in arts education which is cherished here.

You know how important it is to fight off the charterizing agenda meant to weaken our public schools and usurp local control in order to privatize public education. Will that last sentence sound overly heated to some? If so, they need to read your blog!

There are additional issues afflicting our schools – the superintendent salary cap that has driven dozens and dozens of excellent, experienced administrators out of NJ, the war on teachers, the voucher bill that rears its ugly head every few months. Are we ready to deal with all this and more? Not if this is the way in which we elect our school board.

I’m ashamed of our town today. And my level of concern for our schools – already high – is through the roof. But I’m not worried about you. I know you’ll continue your crusade in support of public education. I’m worried for the rest of us.

Thank you for what you’ve already done for our schools and community, and for your unceasing attempts, along with those of your dedicated running mates, to educate our fellow residents. 

In solidarity, Sharon

NJ Education Advocates To Duncan: State's Waiver Plan Is A Disaster

Cross posted from WHYY's NewsWorks NJ

The debate over No Child Left Behind (NCLB) continues in New Jersey, this time over whether the state's new plan to meet federal education standards does enough to help the state's lowest performing schools. The Garden State has received a waiver from NCLB mandates, and a chance to come up with its own plan.

In a letter to U.S. Secretary of Education, Arne Duncan, a number of advocates called on the federal government to suspend the NCLB waiver given to New Jersey. The signers of the letter sent a clear message to Secretary Duncan that New Jersey's plan of carrots and sticks is heavily weighted against minorities, stating "this classification system harks back to the days when such segregation and inequity were policy objectives for our State."

New Jersey's plan

In February of this year, New Jersey was one of ten states to be awarded a "waiver" from many of the mandates in the NCLB legislation. States were granted waivers in exchange for state level accountability based reforms focusing on the lowest performing schools.

With the waiver in hand, the New Jersey Department of Education announced it would develop a system where standardized test scores and graduation rates were used to categorize schools into three groups, "Priority" "Focus" and "Reward."

75 Priority Schools were indentified as the "lowest-performing five percent of Title I schools across the state using proficiency, growth, and graduation rates."

183 Focus schools were identified "based upon achievement gaps between subgroups and low performance or graduation rates among particular subgroups."

And finally, 122 Reward Schools were identified "based on high proficiency levels or high levels of growth, including progress toward closing achievement gaps."

Under this new system, if the 258 Priority and Focus Schools do not improve in two years, they will face sanctions very similar to NCLB, such as closure or charter conversion, while Reward Schools will receive increased autonomy and additional funding.

Regional Achievement Centers (RACs) have been set up all over the state, with some of the funding coming from private donors such as the Broad Foundation, to oversee and "turn around" the Priority and Focus Schools, and potentially take over the management of the schools that don't improve within the two year time limit.

Professor Bruce Baker of the Rutgers University Graduate School of Education has mapped out the Priority, Focus and Reward schools. His work graphically demonstrates that the vast majority of Priority Schools are concentrated in New Jersey's largest, poorest, urban communities while Focus Schools tend to be in and around those communities. Reward Schools however are scattered throughout the states more affluent communities.

New Jersey's plan relies almost exclusively on the same methods that failed to raise achievement under NCLB to "turn around" the 258 targeted schools that serve our state's most vulnerable students.

Why waivers are given

NCLB, signed into law in 2002, has been widely criticized by prominent figures in education, even those who are on opposite sides of most education debates. Education historian Diane Ravitch, a vocal critic of what she calls the 'corporate reform movement', dubbed NCLB the "Death Star of American Education," while Secretary Duncan himself called NCLB "a slow-motion train wreck."

Congress had the opportunity to overhaul the legislation in 2007 when it came up for reauthorization, but was unable to achieve consensus. In 2011 President Obama tasked Congress with rewriting the legislation, but once again, no progress was made.

NCLB set what has been called a utopian goal of 100% proficiency for all students in reading and math by 2014. NCLB requires schools to test all children in grades 3-8 annually and once in high school, and disaggregate the data by subgroups, accounting for race, ethnicity, income, etc.

Schools then must demonstrate that students in all subgroups are making Annual Yearly Progress (AYP) towards the goal of 100% proficiency. If AYP is not met, a school is labeled a School in Need of Improvement (SINI), and each year a school receives this label it faces increasingly severe consequences.

If any subgroup in a school fails to make AYP for five years in a row, the school faces any of several forms of "restructuring" including conversion to a charter school, replacement of staff or closure.

As 2014 approaches, rather than coming closer to the goal of 100% proficiency, more and more public schools are not meeting AYP. By 2011 48% of our nation's schools failed to do so, compared to 38% in 2010 and 33% in 2009. 50% of New Jersey schools didn't make AYP in 2011, but in Massachusetts, the state that boasts the top public school system in the country, 81% failed to do so.

With Congress unable to act to rewrite the legislation, and more schools labeled failures each year, Secretary Duncan offered states waivers from the onerous requirements of NCLB, amid speculation as to whether he had the legal authority to do so.

Groups across the state still signing on

Education advocates across the state continue to add their names to the letter asking for the suspension of the NCLB waiver. They're signing because they understand that the system the state has adopted will inevitably result in the destruction of the public schools in our most vulnerable communities without offering any viable alternatives to improve outcomes for all students.

New Jersey Parent Letter To Obama For The Campaign For Our Public Schools

Deborah Cornavaca and I have written a joint letter for Diane Ravitch's Campaign for Our Public Schools.   Deborah is another tireless parent advocate who has dedicated herself to defending public education in our state.  

Diane's campaign provided the perfect opportunity for Deborah and me to let the President know how his administration's policies are effecting public schools in New Jersey. 

We invite you to join us in this campaign.  If our letter resonates with you, comment below and I will be happy to add your name to the letter, or feel free to download it below and send it as your own. 

If you are feeling inspired, you can write a letter too!  If you do, please share it in the comments below, or email it to me, (darciecimarusti@gmail.com) I would love to read it!  I would also be happy to send it on for you, just let me know.

All letters will be sent to the President tomorrow, October 17th and Diane also asks us to:

write to your Senators and Congressman or -woman and to your state legislator and Governor. Send the same letter to them all.  

Full instructions for sending letters to the President are provided in the link above.  You can find your state Senator and Assemblyman or -woman's contact information here. Governor Christie and your US Senator and Representative's contact information can be found here.  

This is not about whether you support or will vote for President Obama.  This is about parents, teachers and other concerned citizens around the country trying to give our President and legislators a wake up call.  As usual, Diane said it best:

Let’s raise our voices NOW against privatization, against high-stakes testing, against teacher bashing, against profiteering. 

Let’s advocate for policies that are good for students, that truly improve education, that respect the education profession, and that strengthen our democratic system of public education.

Please join the campaign!

New Jersey Parent Letter to Obama

Is Chris Cerf Picky Or Gun-Shy About Charters?

John Mooney of NJ Spotlight reported on the two charters that were approved by Comissioner Chris Cerf and team on Monday.  He said the fact that only two were approved demonstrates that "The Christie administration continues to be picky about new charter schools."

I have a different take on it.

I have read a NJDOE press release or two in my day, and the ones that come out about charter approvals tell a much different story.  Here are some highlights from the last four press releases.

January, 2011:  Acting Commissioner Cerf had just been appointed; here is what he had to say about the announcement of the record 23 charter applications approved in that round.

The record number of new charter schools approved today is a tangible example of Governor Christie’s commitment to bold and ambitious education reforms to put children first in New Jersey.

Huh, OK, so lots of charter approvals = GOOD! 

September, 2011  This is the first round completely overseen by Acting Commissioner Cerf.  Only four are approved, and there is lots of talk about the National Association of Charter School Authorizers working with the NJDOE to continue to "improve the application evaluation to align with national best practices"

This is the round where Regis Academy was approved in Cherry Hill, which as we now know was an unmitigated disaster for Cerf and Christie.  

Yet, here is what Cerf had to say in the press release:

The most important bar that any applicant must clear is demonstrating that the school has a very high likelihood of providing an excellent education to its students.  Through our rigorous review process, we became confident that these four schools will offer students a great education on day one of the school year.

Knowing what we know now about Regis, Cerf's "confidence" is down right comical.

And huh, OK, now less charter approvals = GOOD!

January 2012:  Cerf is now firmly entrenched as Commissioner, he has a full year under his belt.  This is the round where my community came down hard on Cerf and the NJDOE for their lack of transparency and accountability to districts, and the ELC and Senator Nia Gill came down hard on them for not releasing the names of the outside reviewers contracted to evaluate charter applications.

So this time around the press release not only talks about how hard they are working to "strengthen" the application review process, it is filled with platitudes about how seriously they take public input:

The Department also receives and reviews significant public comment during this process. 

In the third part of the process, the Department brings each team in for an intensive, in-person interview where applicants are asked about both the academic and operational components of the proposed school.  In addition, the public and district comments received are incorporated into the interview questions. The review team also closely examines the school’s financial plan and budget.  The Commissioner of Education then makes a final determination about which applications to approve.  Approval decisions are made based on the quality of the proposed educational program, the capacity of the founding team to implement that program, and the need for the proposed school in the community.  (Emphasis mine)

And at the end of the press release a list of the names of the reviewers appears for the first time.

 October 2012:  This was the quietest application round in quite some time.  No contentious debates about boutique charter schools in thriving districts, no protests at the NJDOE.  There was however some opposition in Hoboken to an application which, if approved, would have continued to increase the segregative effect Hoboken charters already have on that district, but it didn't generate any state wide coverage.

Only two schools were approved, one in Camden and one in Newark.  (St.) Phillips Academy is the first private to charter conversion, and the International Academy of Camden, which Mooney describes as "an elementary school founded by a group of New Jersey entrepreneurs and likely to be run by a private education management organization."

More on the demise of independent, parent/teacher driven charters in another post on another day...

For now, let's get back to the press release.

No list of the external reviewers and less talk about community input this time around.  Without public pressure, the NJDOE goes back to business as usual.  Instead they talk about  "recruiting high-performing charter operators from across the country to expand into New Jersey."  

Read between the lines, and the implication is that if we bring in EMO's and CMO's we don't really need to bother with much review or community input at all, just let the professionals come in and set up shop.  

In the wake of Cerf's decision not to grant a final charter to Regis, along with nine other charters that had been in pipeline, we are treated to lengthy assurances that even though these applications have been approved they still need to obtain their final charter.

In order for any of these schools to open, they must first complete a "preparedness review," to ensure they have the academic, operational components, and capacity to successfully meet the needs of children through a successful academic programs, financial viability, equitability, and organization soundness.  After a review of the applicants' submission of this information in June of 2013, the Commissioner will render a final approval decision in July for charters to open their doors in September.

What happened to the cocksure Cerf of 2011, who bragged that dozens of charter approvals signaled the Christie administrations "commitment to bold and ambitious education reforms to put children first" and his confidence in the application review process, led by NACSA, that ensured that approved applications were ready to provide a "great education on day one of the school year?"

Ya know what happened?  WE HAPPENED!  We, the people of New Jersey.  Parents, teachers, students, professors, education historians and even some of our fine legislators that support public education, and organizations like the Education Law Center and some of the fine folks that work there, like Stan Karp.

We're all doing our best to let them know that we're paying attention and we're going to fight like hell before we let them dismantle our public schools.  

So now Cerf and his Office of Charter Schools are gun-shy.  They're constantly changing their approach to dodge public pressure.  The press releases show that we have them on the run.    

At a recent public meeting in Jersey City Commissioner Cerf said he doesn't read the blogs, but just in case.

BOO!

I Made The Honor Roll

On school mornings my alarm goes off about 7:15 and my girls climb into bed with me for a quick snuggle before we get up and get going.  I usually check my email as we lie in bed.  

I follow Diane Ravitch's blog, as I am sure many of you do, and get email notifications whenever she posts.  I am often amazed at how late and/or how early she has posted, and wonder when this amazing woman sleeps!

When I read the title of an email from 7:04 this morning my heart stopped.

A New Jersey Mom: Another Hero of Public Education

When I read that it was about me, I cried.  

Darcie Cimarusti is a hero of public education. As a parent of young children in the fine public schools of New Jersey, she became alarmed when a charter planned to open in her community. She knew that the charter would divide the community and undercut the public schools.

This is her story. She joins the honor roll of heroes.

She became an active crusader to defend public education in New Jersey. She has her own blog “Mother Crusader,” she writes letters to the editor, she testifies at hearings, she organizes other parents. She is a champion. With a mother crusader in every community, we could win the fight about big money.

I read it to my girls, and they beamed.  They may be the only 6 year olds in New Jersey who know Diane Ravitch by name.  

I have missed out on lots of time with my girls these last 18 months or so, and when I head off to a meeting or event, I try to tell them not only what I am doing but why I am doing it.  Last May I had the opportunity to sit on a panel with Diane after a lecture she gave in New Brunswick.  When I left to go to the event I told them how excited I was to be on the panel with Diane, and all about who she is and what she does.  

Diane comes up often in our house, yet still, my girls can't seem to get her name right.  

They call her Diane Radish. 

When I got involved in my town's battle against an unwanted charter, the fight was well underway.  People in our community were meeting, planning, and strategizing, but I noticed that similar conversations were happening not only across the state, but across the country.  I dove head first into those state and national conversations, and in the end, I think that perspective is what galvanized our opposition.  It gave us a strength in numbers we did not have before.

I have heard Diane say that they have money but we have numbers.  She's right.  It is the power in those numbers that saved my town from an unwanted charter school backed by a hedge fund demi billionaire and the United Stated Department of Education.  

Diane not only gives all of us the chance to get our voices heard, but to come together and gain the wisdom and courage to go out and make sure the schools our students and children rely on are not completely dismantled by profiteers and privatizers.

Were it not for her (and Jersey Jazzman too) there would be no me.

At least no Mother Crusader me. 

And for that, my girls and I thank you Dr. Radish.